VA Communication: 5 Keys to Trust in 2026

Listen to this article · 11 min listen

When communicating with or about veterans, the language we choose isn’t just about politeness; it’s about building trust, fostering understanding, and genuinely helping. My experience running a non-profit focused on veteran reintegration showed me that aiming for a supportive and informative tone isn’t optional—it’s foundational. But how do you consistently strike that balance without sounding condescending or overly academic?

Key Takeaways

  • Always prioritize person-first language, such as “veteran with PTSD” instead of “PTSD sufferer,” to emphasize the individual over their condition.
  • Utilize active listening techniques, like reflective statements and open-ended questions, to ensure veterans feel heard and understood in every interaction.
  • Structure information logically using tools like Grammarly for clarity and Hemingway Editor to simplify complex concepts, ensuring accessibility for all audiences.
  • Before dissemination, conduct a “tone check” with a diverse group, including veterans, to catch unintended implications and refine your message’s impact.
  • Provide actionable resources and clear next steps, such as direct links to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs benefits page or local support groups, in all communications.

1. Master Person-First Language and Avoid Jargon

This is where it all begins. Your language should always center the individual, not their experiences or conditions. Instead of saying “a homeless veteran,” say “a veteran experiencing homelessness.” This subtle shift acknowledges their identity and agency. We’re not talking about labels; we’re talking about people. I’ve seen firsthand how quickly a conversation can shut down if someone feels reduced to a stereotype.

Settings & Tools: This isn’t a tool setting, per se, but a mindset. However, I strongly recommend using a grammar checker like Grammarly. While it won’t flag person-first language directly, its suggestions for conciseness and clarity can help you rephrase sentences more effectively. For example, if you write “PTSD sufferers,” Grammarly might flag “sufferers” as potentially negative, prompting you to rethink. A good habit is to review your draft specifically for this principle.

Screenshot Description: Imagine a screenshot of a Google Docs document. A sentence reads: “The PTSD-afflicted veteran struggled.” The editor’s cursor hovers over “PTSD-afflicted.” A comment bubble appears, suggesting: “Consider ‘The veteran experiencing PTSD struggled’ for a more person-centered approach.”

Pro Tip: Create a Style Guide

For any organization working with veterans, a simple internal style guide listing preferred and discouraged terms is invaluable. Include examples like:

  • Instead of: “The addict veteran” Use: “The veteran managing substance use disorder”
  • Instead of: “Handicapped veteran” Use: “Veteran with a disability”
  • Instead of: “Soldier” (unless specifically referring to Army personnel) Use: “Service member” or “Veteran”

This ensures consistency across all your communications.

Common Mistake: Over-reliance on Acronyms

The military uses a lot of acronyms. A LOT. While they’re second nature to service members, they’re often baffling to civilians. Avoid acronyms like MOS, PCS, ETS, or VA unless you explicitly define them on first use. Even then, consider if the full term is simply clearer. When I started my non-profit, we made this mistake constantly in our early outreach materials. We’d talk about “VA benefits” without ever spelling out “Department of Veterans Affairs,” assuming everyone knew. They didn’t.

2. Prioritize Clarity and Conciseness

Information overload is real, especially for individuals who might be dealing with stress, trauma, or simply navigating complex systems. Your message should be easy to understand, even for someone who’s tired or distracted. Get to the point. No fluff. I believe brevity is a sign of respect for the reader’s time and cognitive load.

Settings & Tools: My go-to tool here is Hemingway Editor. I copy and paste my text into it, and it highlights sentences that are too long, complex, or use passive voice. My personal target is to keep its “Readability Grade” at 8 or below. Anything higher means I need to simplify. Another fantastic, often overlooked setting is in Microsoft Word. Go to File > Options > Proofing > Settings (under ‘When correcting spelling and grammar in Word’). Make sure ‘Readability Statistics’ is checked. After a spell check, Word will give you Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Flesch Reading Ease scores. Aim for a Flesch-Kincaid score under 8 and a Flesch Reading Ease score above 60. These metrics are a surprisingly objective way to gauge your text’s accessibility.

Screenshot Description: A screenshot of Hemingway Editor with a paragraph of text. Several sentences are highlighted in yellow (long sentences) and red (very hard to read). A sidebar shows the readability grade as “Grade 10.” Below it, suggestions like “Simplify ‘subsequently'” and “Remove ‘in order to'” are visible.

3. Emphasize Empathy and Validation

A supportive tone isn’t just about what you say, but how you make someone feel. Validation means acknowledging their experiences and emotions as legitimate. This doesn’t mean agreeing with everything, but it means understanding their perspective. For instance, when discussing benefits, instead of just listing requirements, you might start with, “Navigating VA benefits can feel overwhelming, and many veterans experience frustration with the process. We’re here to help simplify it.”

Practical Application: In face-to-face or phone interactions, practice active listening. Use phrases like, “What I hear you saying is…” or “It sounds like you’re feeling frustrated about…” This isn’t just a communication technique; it’s a demonstration of genuine care. In written content, use testimonials (with permission, of course) or case studies to show you understand common challenges. For example, a Wounded Warrior Project report in 2023 highlighted that 75% of post-9/11 veterans reported feeling disconnected from civilian life. Acknowledging this statistic and offering solutions shows you’re tuned into their realities.

Pro Tip: Use “We” and “You” Mindfully

Using “we” can foster a sense of shared purpose, while “you” directly addresses the veteran. Avoid an overly academic or detached “one should.” For example, “We understand applying for disability can be complex, so we’ve broken down the steps for you.” This creates a much more inviting and helpful tone than “Applicants should follow these steps.”

4. Provide Actionable Information and Clear Next Steps

An informative tone means giving practical, usable details. Don’t just tell veterans about a problem; offer solutions or resources. Every piece of communication, whether it’s a website page, an email, or a brochure, should have a clear call to action or next step. What do you want them to do after reading your message?

Specifics: If you’re discussing housing assistance, provide direct links to local resources like the Georgia Department of Community Affairs‘ housing programs or the VA’s Homeless Veterans Program. For mental health support, list the Veterans Crisis Line (dial 988 then Press 1) and local VA medical centers, such as the Atlanta VA Medical Center at 1670 Clairmont Rd, Decatur, GA 30033. Don’t just say “seek help”; say “Call the Veterans Crisis Line at 988, then Press 1, available 24/7.”

Common Mistake: Vague Resource Listings

Listing “local support groups” without providing names, contact information, or meeting times is unhelpful. Similarly, saying “check the VA website” is far less effective than “Visit va.gov/health-care/eligibility/ for detailed eligibility requirements.” Be precise.

5. Implement a “Tone Check” Review Process

You can write with the best intentions, but sometimes your message might not land as intended. This is why a review process is essential. I’ve been burned by this before. We once sent out a newsletter celebrating a program’s success, and while the data was impressive, a veteran called us, feeling it minimized the ongoing struggles. It was an unintentional oversight on our part.

Process: Before any major communication goes out, especially to a broad audience, have a small, diverse group review it. This group should ideally include veterans themselves, family members of veterans, and individuals from different backgrounds. Ask them specific questions:

  • Does this sound respectful?
  • Is anything unclear or confusing?
  • Does it feel like it’s talking to me, or at me?
  • Are there any phrases that could be misinterpreted?

This isn’t about nitpicking; it’s about ensuring your message resonates positively. We call this our “Veterans’ Lens Review” at my current organization. It’s not just about grammar; it’s about impact.

Case Study: The “Transitioning Service Member” Brochure

At my previous firm, we developed a brochure aimed at service members leaving the military. Our initial draft used corporate-speak, focusing on “synergistic opportunities” and “upskilling initiatives.” It was technically informative but completely devoid of warmth. During our tone check, a retired Marine bluntly told us, “This sounds like something written by a robot. You need to talk like you actually care about what we’re going through.”

Outcome: We completely rewrote it. We adopted a conversational tone, focused on acknowledging the challenges of civilian employment, and included testimonials from veterans who had successfully transitioned. We even added a section on managing expectations about civilian job applications. The revised brochure, distributed at a job fair at Fort Gordon, saw a 300% increase in engagement (measured by QR code scans to our website) compared to a similar, corporately-toned brochure we’d used the previous year. The key was shifting from a purely informational, almost clinical tone to one that was genuinely supportive and understanding of their unique journey. We even explicitly mentioned the value of their military skills, translating them into civilian terms, which was a direct suggestion from our veteran reviewers.

Mastering a supportive and informative tone with veterans requires conscious effort, continuous learning, and a willingness to listen. It’s about building bridges of understanding, one carefully chosen word at a time. This approach can also significantly impact how veterans navigate their financial roadmap and overall well-being. Furthermore, effective communication is vital when discussing sensitive topics like VA disability claims, ensuring veterans receive the support and benefits they deserve.

Why is person-first language so important when communicating with veterans?

Person-first language is crucial because it emphasizes the individual’s identity over any condition or experience they may have, such as “a veteran with PTSD” instead of “a PTSD veteran.” This approach promotes dignity, reduces stigma, and helps foster a more respectful and empathetic connection by focusing on the person first.

What tools can help me ensure my writing is clear and concise for veterans?

For clarity and conciseness, I highly recommend Hemingway Editor to identify complex sentences and passive voice, aiming for a readability grade of 8 or lower. Additionally, Grammarly can assist with grammar and conciseness, while Microsoft Word’s Readability Statistics (found in Proofing Options) provide Flesch-Kincaid and Flesch Reading Ease scores, helping you objectively measure and improve your text’s accessibility.

How can I incorporate empathy and validation into written communications?

To incorporate empathy and validation in writing, acknowledge common challenges and emotions veterans might experience. Start with phrases that show understanding, such as “Navigating benefits can be overwhelming.” You can also cite relevant statistics from reputable sources like the Wounded Warrior Project to demonstrate awareness of their experiences, and use inclusive language like “we” and “you” to foster a sense of shared purpose and direct address.

What does “actionable information” mean in the context of veteran communication?

Actionable information means providing clear, practical details that empower veterans to take specific next steps. Instead of vague advice, offer direct links to official resources like the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs website, specific phone numbers like the Veterans Crisis Line (988 then Press 1), or exact addresses for local support centers. Every communication should guide them toward a concrete solution or resource.

Why is a “tone check” review process critical, and who should be involved?

A “tone check” review process is critical because it helps catch unintended implications or misinterpretations that could undermine your message, ensuring it resonates positively with its intended audience. This review should ideally involve a diverse group, including veterans, their family members, and individuals from various backgrounds, who can provide feedback on clarity, respectfulness, and overall impact before dissemination.

Alexandra Harris

Veterans Affairs Consultant Certified Veterans Benefits Counselor (CVBC)

Alexandra Harris is a nationally recognized Veterans Affairs Consultant specializing in transition support and advocacy. With over a decade of experience, Alexandra has dedicated her career to improving the lives of veterans and their families. She has previously served as a Senior Advisor at the American Veterans Alliance and currently consults with the Veteran Empowerment Network. Alexandra Harris is the recipient of the prestigious Secretary's Award for Outstanding Service for her work in developing innovative mental health resources for returning service members.